Collective judging in comparative perspective : counting votes and weighing options / edited by Birke Hacker, Wolfgang Ernst.

Holdings

Loading holdings...

Record details

Publication details:
Cambridge : Intersentia, 2020
Edition:
1st edition
Record id:
90331
Author:
Hacker, Birke, 1977- ed. 
Ernst, Wolfgang, 1956- ed. 
Series:
Intersentia studies on courts and judges.
Subject:
Judicial process -- Congresses.
Court administration.
Judicial process.
Judges.
Contents:
Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Part I. 1. Part II. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part III. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Part IV. 11. Part V. 12. 13. 14. 15. Part VI. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks. Designing collegiate courts' decision-making processes
The fine-mechanics of Judicial Majoritarianism
Collegiate Courts in the common law tradition
Collective judging in the UK Supreme Court
Collective judging in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales
An Australian perspective on collective judging
Collegial decision-making in the US Courts of Appeals
Collegiate Courts in the European civil law tradition
Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation
Collective judging in Germany
Why is the German Federal Constitutional Court a deliberative court, and why is that a good thing? A comparative assessment
Collective judging at the Swiss Supreme Court
Decision-making in Appellate Courts: an Austrian experience
Collegiate Courts in a non-European civil law jurisdiction: the case of Japan
Collective judging by Collegiate Courts in Japan
Supranational and international Collegiate Courts
The fine-mechanics of judicial decision-making at the European Court of Human Rights
Collective judging in the court of justice of the European Union
The anatomy of the deliberation process at international criminal tribunals
Collective judging in the Catholic Church
Voices from the audience and closing remarks
Decision-making by the boards of appeal of the European patent office
Collegiality and collectivity in common law courts
Should judges tell us what they think?
Beyond anecdote and synecdoche
Concluding remarks.
Summary:
This book focuses on the decision-making processes in modern collegiate courts. Judges from some of the world's highest and most significant judicial bodies, both national and supranational, share their experiences and reflect on the challenges to which their joint judicial endeavour gives rise. - Publisher's website.
Note:
Includes bibliographical references.
Variant title:
Counting votes and weighing options
ISBN:
9
Phys. description:
xxi, 342 p. : ill. ; 26 cm