PART 1. Parody-Nature and Definition
1. What is a Parody?
2. Origin and Historical Overview of Parody in Art Fields
3. The Relationship of Parody with Other Related Concepts
4. Cultural Scholars' Definition of Parody
5. Towards a Legal Definition of Parody
PART 2. Legality of the Parody Exception in Light of International Treaties and Domestic Copyright Laws
1. Introduction
2. Why is a Specific Parody Exception Needed in Copyright Legislation?
3. What is the Three-Step Test?
4. Compliance of the Parody Exception with the Three-Step Test
5. Conclusion
PART 3. Consequences of the Nature of the Parody Exception
1. The 'Mechanics' Behind the Parody Exception
2. The Nature of a Parody Exception in Copyright Law
3. Can the Parody Exception be Waived by Contract?
4. Conclusion
PART 4. Factors to Consider for the Application of the Parody Exception
1. The Difficulty of Defining the Exception's Contours
2. Factors Commonly Applied
3. Factors Relevant for Certain Jurisdictions Only
4. Irrelevant Factors for the Application of the Parody Exception
5. Can Domestic Courts Adopt Additional Factors?
6. Conclusion
PART 5. How Freedom of Expression Defines the Parody Exception
1. Introduction
2. The Parody Exception Embodying Human Rights Aspects
3. Scope of Freedom of Expression at Supranational Levels
4. Restrictions to Freedom of Expression to Respect the Rights of Others
5. Striking a Balance at Domestic Level: the Importance of Constitutional Influences
6. Conclusion
PART 6. Parody and Moral Rights
1. Introduction
2. Why Parodies Sit Uncomfortably with Moral Rights
3. The Implications of Monist and Dualist Theories for the Parody Exception
4. Does the Parody Exception Clash with the Personal Interests of the Author?
5. Conclusion
PART 7. The Music Industry and the Future of the Parody Exception in Copyright Law
1. The Role of Business Practices in the Realization of the Goals Underpinning the Parody Exception
2. Shaping the Parody Exception Using the Human Rights Framework
3. Preventing Abuses
4. A Desirable Harmonization
5. Conclusion: Towards a Right to Parody?